![]() ![]() If it's not possible to whitelist the correct link for this article, that's your problem. Conti| ✉ 17:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Reply Eh, again, my side won. Working around the blacklist is not the way to go. If you want a working link to ED's homepage, convince the community to take the site off the blacklist. Kendrick7 talk 02:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Reply You're free not to care about the blacklisting, but that's not going to undo it. Nevertheless, I believe a working link to the site of some provenance should be in the sidebar. Conti| ✉ 00:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Reply I neither know, nor care, about the ongoing political machinations that prevent a proper link to the site being whitelisted for this page. In addition, you declared the about page of ED as the official homepage, which is simply incorrect. That is important information that should be kept either way. More importantly, however, your edits removed the link to the original ED homepage, as well as information about it. Has the war continued on without me? - Kendrick7 talk 00:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Reply As far as I know, ED is still blacklisted, with the exception of the about page that is used as a reference. OK, I admit, I haven't kept up with the WP:BADSITES / WP:LINKLOVE battles, but I distinctly remember my side, the pro-link side, won. billinghurst sDrewth 09:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Reply Having a working if not perfect link in the sidebar Follow the policy and request a blacklist removal if that is your desire, and see how it progresses. Purposefully using a redirect or an url shortener to get around a block is courting disaster. although to me, Wikipedia has never screamed "efficient." 50.59.14.6 ( talk) 18:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Reply It sounds to me like whitelisting a link is a long drawn-out process and is a remnant of some long-gone policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |